Oil


Games for ChangeOver at Play This Thing!, game commentator the99th has published some highlights from the Games for Change 2008 Conference.

I find this bit particularly interesting:

I got to meet Paolo Pedercini, he’s working on a new game called Oilgarchy which is about peak oil, and might do another Monsanto* game. Soon, Monsanto* games will reign down in a saturation akin to terminator seeds or social network sites. He also told me something that is probably historic, but it hasn’t gone public yet.

- Patrick Dugan (the99th) @ Play This Thing!: Link.

* I’m pretty sure the99th really means McDonald’s, not Monsanto. No doubt the conference was hectic and the99th had a lot on his mind as he blogged his notes.
See McDonald’s Video Game.

Games for Change Conference 2008: Link.

Paolo Pedercini: Link

Peak Oil: Link.



“… Fuel for international travel and transport of goods, including food, is exempt from taxes, unlike trucks, cars and buses. There is also no tax on fuel used by ocean freighters.”
Kiwi production in Italy

Cod caught off Norway is shipped to China to be turned into filets, then shipped back to Norway for sale. Argentine lemons fill supermarket shelves on the Citrus Coast of Spain, as local lemons rot on the ground. Half of Europe’s peas are grown and packaged in Kenya.

… Under longstanding trade agreements, fuel for international freight carried by sea and air is not taxed. Now, many economists, environmental advocates and politicians say it is time to make shippers and shoppers pay for the pollution, through taxes or other measures.

… Proponents say ending these breaks could help ensure that producers and consumers pay the environmental cost of increasingly well-traveled food.

The food and transport industries say the issue is more complicated.

- Elisabeth Rosenthal @ New York Times: April 26, 2008: Link.

Via Jon Taplin’s blog: Link.



Iran Oil Bourse: February 2008“What Iran plans to do in the long run is quite daring: to confront head-on Anglo-American energy/corporate banking domination of the international oil trade. “

The Iranian oil bourse — the first oil, gas and petrochemical exchange in the Islamic Republic, and the first within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) — was launched on Sunday by Iran’s Oil Minister Gholam-Hossein Nozari, flanked by Minister of Economy and Financial Affairs Davoud Danesh Ja’fari, the man who will head the exchange.

… Transactions at this early stage will be in Iran’s currency, the rial, according to Nozari, ending worldwide speculation that the bourse would start trading in euros. The Iranian ambassador to Russia, Gholam-Reza Ansari, has said that “in the future, we’ll be able to use the ruble, Russia’s national currency, in our operations”. He added that “Russia and Iran, two major producers of the world’s energy, should encourage oil and gas transactions in various non-dollar currencies, releasing the world from being a slave of the dollar.”

Russia’s First Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev said last week that “the ruble will de facto become one of the regional reserve currencies”.

The opening of the exchange is just what the Iranians are calling the first phase. Ultimately, it is intended that it will compete directly against London’s International Petroleum Exchange (IPE) and the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX), both owned by US corporations (since 2001, NYMEX has been owned by a consortium that includes BP, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley). What Iran plans to do in the long run is quite daring: to confront head-on Anglo-American energy/corporate banking domination of the international oil trade.

- Pepe Escobar, Asia Times Online: Link.

[Image: “About 20 brokers are already active in Iran’s newly-established oil stock market.” Via Alalam News: Link.]

Iranian Oil Bourse @ Wikipedia



Flag of IranIran plays a strong hand in the global petroleum market:

Iran Opens Its 1st Oil Products Bourse

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) — Iran established its first oil products bourse Sunday [February 17, 2008] in a free trade zone on the Persian Gulf Island of Kish, the country’s oil ministry said.

… Oil and petrochemical products will be traded in Iranian Rials, as well as all other hard currencies, the statement quoted Iranian Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari as saying. About 20 brokers are already active in the market, it said.

… Iran has already registered for another oil bourse, in which it has said it hopes to trade oil in Euros instead of dollars ….

- Associated Press @ Google: Iran Opens Its 1st Oil Products Bourse.

See also:

Iran: Goodbye Dollar, Hello Euro

Interview with Chris Cook, inventor of the Iran Oil Bourse



Iranian oil no longer available for U.S. dollars

Iran has decided to abandon oil export settlements in U.S. dollars.

Our current policy is to sell crude oil for any currency but U.S. dollars, Iran’s Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari said in a statement, adding that all settlements in the U.S. currency had been ruled out.

Iran has been considering this move for a long time, consistently limiting the inflow of petrodollars in the past two years. Iranian officials claim that the reason behind their decision is the devaluation of the dollar. An Iranian source said that the dollar’s decline was greatly harming the oil exporting nations’ economies and that they had no more trust in the U.S. currency.

… Incidentally, on November 30, Gazprom’s Deputy CEO Alexander Medvedev said in New York that the Russian gas monopoly was considering a possibility of selling gas for rubles instead of dollars or euros. The gas giant was compelled to change its currency policy by the current situation on the global financial markets. Although he did not specify the date, Andrei Kruglov, head of Gazprom’s Finance and Economics Department, said the decision would be made soon enough.

… The U.S. dollar has certainly lost much of its attractiveness worldwide, unlike the euro which is gaining popularity, even if not in all countries.

… Other monetary units are being added to the pool of the main reserve currencies. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), which includes the key Middle East oil and gas exporters, has said it was planning to set up a single regional currency, the Gulf Dinar, which would be put in circulation in three years and would be as important as the dollar and the euro. The GCC includes the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar and Oman.

… Xu Jian, a vice director of the People’s Bank of China, said last week that the dollar was “losing its status as the world currency,” adding that it was likely to continue weakening in 2008 due to the growing U.S. trade deficit.

- Dr Igor Tomberg, economist, senior research associate at the Energy Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences’ Institute of World Economy and International Relations. Russian News and Information Agency, 11/ 12/ 2007: link.

Iran Drops Dollar From Oil Deals

Major crude producer Iran has completely stopped carrying out its oil transactions in dollars, Oil Minister Gholam Hossein Nozari said on Saturday, labelling the greenback an “unreliable” currency.

… Nozari did not specify in which currencies Iran was now being paid. In the past, officials have said most oil income was in euros, with a significant percentage in yen.

Japan, which purchases 20 percent of Iran’s crude oil, has recently agreed to pay for the crude oil in yen, officials have said. The UAE dirham has also been mooted as a possible payment currency.

… The United States has in recent months successfully encouraged major European and Asian banks to cut their dealings with Iran in a bid to make the Islamic republic give way on its controversial nuclear programme.

AFP, 11 December, 2007: link.

Iran stops selling oil in US dollars

… OPEC giant Iran has completely stopped selling any of its oil for US dollars.

… Iran says the weak US currency is eroding its purchasing power. At the latest November summit of OPEC, Iran suggested oil should be sold in a basket of currencies rather than dollars, but failed to win over other members except Venezuela.

- South African Broadcasting Corporation: December 08, 2007, 13:45: link.

Iran ‘euro-based’ oil bourse underway

An official said that the managing director of Iran’s first petroleum exchange “Iran Oil Bourse” is expected to be appointed soon, bringing the oil-rich nation a step closer to opening its first ‘oil bourse’. Majid Shayesteh, managing director of Kish Free Trade Zone Organization, said that President Mahmud Ahmadinejad has directed Iran’s ministers of oil, economic affairs and finance to appoint the board of directors of the oil exchange and its managing director. He did not specify when exactly the exchange would open.

He also said the building which will house Iran’s first oil exchange has been constructed on the Persian Gulf island of Kish and that the required technical equipment has been installed.

Shayesteh added that three major organizations are involved in the groundbreaking project, saying that coordinating efforts between the various groups initially delayed the project.

According to the official, the articles of association for the oil exchange have since been approved. Last month, a separate official announced that the petroleum exchange would begin operation “in the near future.”

Mahmud Salahi, secretary of the High Council for Free Trade and Industrial Zones, had said that Iran decided to establish the euro-based oil exchange on Kish because “there was no such oil trading body in the region.” The oil exchange will transact petroleum, petrochemicals and gas in various non-dollar currencies, primarily the euro. It would also establish a euro-based pricing mechanism for oil trading, or ‘oil marker’ as it is commonly called by traders.

Oil Minister Kazem Vaziri Hamaneh said earlier that a stock market for trade in shares of oil companies will be established in Iran’s southern of Kish in the near future. While touring of a local gas transfer operation, the minister said the stock market will be set up in cooperation with the oil and finance ministries.

Last month, after a year of speculation, Iran changed its oil bourse from petrodollars to petroeuros.

- Persian Journal: Mar 11, 2007: link.

Iran turns from dollar to euro in oil sales

The world’s fourth-biggest oil exporter has inserted a clause in its oil contracts allowing it to request payment in alternative currencies.

… Iran announced plans in 2004 to develop an Iranian oil bourse, a commodity exchange that would become a Middle Eastern rival to the major exchanges in New York, London and Singapore, which set benchmark oil prices.

The Iranian bourse would also challenge the petrodollar by setting oil prices in euros. However, there has been little progress in establishing the bourse, which failed to launch as planned last March.

… The fall in the dollar against major currencies has had a dramatic impact on the revenues of oil exporters and has exacerbated the rumbling anti- American feeling in the Gulf.

Although Gulf Arab states are predominantly dollar export earners, they mainly purchase in euros and yen, buying food, consumer goods and manufactured products from Europe and the Far East.

In March the United Arab Emirates said that it would switch 10 per cent of its currency reserves from dollars to euros, a decision that closely followed the attempt by the US Congress to block the acquisition by Dubai Ports World of a number of ports in the United States.

Times Online, December 22, 2006: link.

Iran to replace dollar with euro
Iran also indicated that it will calculate its budget revenues in euros

The Iranian central bank is to convert the state’s foreign dollar assets into euros and use the euro for foreign transactions.

“The government has ordered the central bank to replace the dollar with the euro to limit the problems of the executive organs in commercial transactions,” Gholam Hossein Elham, a government spokesman, said on Monday.

“We will also employ this change for Iranian assets [in dollars] held abroad.”

Elham said that Iran’s budget would in future be calculated in euros.

“Until now the budget has been calculated according to revenues in dollars but this calculation will now change,” he said.

- Aljazeera, December 18, 2006: link.

The Emerging Euro-denominated International Oil Marker

In 2005-2006, The Tehran government has a developed a plan to begin competing with New York’s NYMEX and London’s IPE with respect to international oil trades - using a euro-denominated international oil-trading mechanism. This means that without some form of US intervention, the euro is going to establish a firm foothold in the international oil trade. Given U.S. debt levels and the stated neoconservative project for U.S. global domination, Tehran’s objective constitutes an obvious encroachment on U.S. dollar supremacy in the international oil market

… ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’ was a war designed to install a pro-U.S. puppet in Iraq, establish multiple U.S military bases before the onset of Peak Oil, and to reconvert Iraq back to petrodollars while hoping to thwart further OPEC momentum towards the euro as an alternative oil transaction currency.

… [A] Financial Times article dated June 5th, 2003, … confirmed Iraqi oil sales returning to the international markets were once again denominated in US dollars, not euros. Not surprisingly, this detail was never mentioned in the five US major media conglomerates who appear to censor this type of information ….

“The tender, for which bids are due by June 10, switches the transaction back to dollars — the international currency of oil sales - despite the greenback’s recent fall in value. Saddam Hussein in 2000 insisted Iraq’s oil be sold for euros, a political move, but one that improved Iraq’s recent earnings thanks to the rise in the value of the euro against the dollar.”

… To date, one of the more difficult technical obstacles concerning a euro-based oil transaction trading system is the lack of a euro-denominated oil pricing standard, or oil ‘marker’ as it is referred to in the industry. The three current oil markers are U.S. dollar denominated, which include the West Texas Intermediate crude (WTI), Norway Brent crude, and the UAE Dubai crude. However, since the spring of 2003, Iran has required payments in the euro currency for its European and Asian/ACU exports - although the oil pricing for trades are still denominated in the dollar.

Therefore, a potentially significant news development was reported in June 2004 announcing Iran’s intentions to create of an Iranian oil Bourse. (The word “bourse” refers to a stock exchange for securities trading, and is derived from the French stock exchange in Paris, the Federation Internationale des Bourses de Valeurs.) This announcement portended competition would arise between the Iranian oil bourse and London’s International Petroleum Exchange (IPE), as well as the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). It should be noted that both the IPE and NYMEX are owned by U.S. corporations.

The macroeconomic implications of a successful Iranian Bourse are noteworthy. Considering that Iran has switched to the euro for its oil payments from E.U. and ACU customers, it would be logical to assume the proposed Iranian Bourse will usher in a fourth crude oil marker – denominated in the euro currency.

The IPE, bought in 2001 by a consortium that includes BP, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, was unwilling to discuss the Iranian move yesterday. “We would not have any comment to make on it at this stage,” said an IPE spokeswoman. ”

… Additionally … Saudi investors may be interested in participating in the Iranian oil exchange market, further illustrating why petrodollar hegemony is becoming unsustainable.

“…Along with several other members of OPEC, Iranian oil officials believe crude trading on the New York Mercantile Exchange and the IPE is controlled by the oil majors and big financial companies, who benefit from market volatility.”

… A successful Iranian bourse would solidify the petroeuro as an alternative oil transaction currency, and thereby end the petrodollar’s hegemonic status as the monopoly oil currency. Therefore, a graduated approach is needed to avoid precipitous U.S. economic dislocations. Multilateral compromise with the EU and OPEC regarding oil currency is certainly preferable to an ‘Operation Iranian Freedom,’ or perhaps an attempted CIA-sponsored repeat of the 1953 Iranian coup – operation “Ajax” part II.

- William Clark @ Global Research, 27 October 2004: link.

Wikipedia: Petroeuro.



Brazil Flag“A huge offshore oil discovery could raise Brazil’s petroleum reserves by a whopping 40 percent and boost this country into the ranks of the world’s major exporters, officials said.”

The government-run oil company Petroleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras, said the new “ultra-deep” Tupi field could hold as much as 8 billion barrels of recoverable light crude, sending Petrobras shares soaring and prompting predictions that Brazil could join the world’s “top 10″ oil producers.

Petrobras President Sergio Gabrielli said Thursday the oil from ultradeep areas, including the Tupi field, would give Brazil the world’s eighth-largest oil and gas reserves.

“Brazil’s reserves will lie somewhere between those of Nigeria and those of Venezuela,” Gabrielli said at a news conference.

Petrobras says the Tupi field, off Brazil’s southeastern Atlantic coast, has between 5 billion and 8 billion barrels — equivalent to 40 percent of all the oil ever discovered in Brazil.

- CNN: link.

Google News: Brazil Oil: link.

Wikipedia: Brazil: link.



“An April 2007 report … suggests that the Pentagon might consume as much as 340,000 barrels (14 million gallons) every day. “

Sixteen gallons of oil. That’s how much the average American soldier in Iraq and Afghanistan consumes on a daily basis — either directly, through the use of Humvees, tanks, trucks, and helicopters, or indirectly, by calling in air strikes. Multiply this figure by 162,000 soldiers in Iraq, 24,000 in Afghanistan, and 30,000 in the surrounding region (including sailors aboard U.S. warships in the Persian Gulf) and you arrive at approximately 3.5 million gallons of oil: the daily petroleum tab for U.S. combat operations in the Middle East war zone.

Multiply that daily tab by 365 and you get 1.3 billion gallons: the estimated annual oil expenditure for U.S. combat operations in Southwest Asia. That’s greater than the total annual oil usage of Bangladesh, population 150 million — and yet it’s a gross underestimate of the Pentagon’s wartime consumption.

… For every soldier stationed “in theater,” there are two more in transit, in training, or otherwise in line for eventual deployment to the war zone … Moreover, to sustain an “expeditionary” army located halfway around the world, the Department of Defense must move millions of tons of arms, ammunition, food, fuel, and equipment every year by plane or ship, consuming additional tanker-loads of petroleum.

… It can be difficult to obtain precise details on the DoD’s daily oil hit, but an April 2007 report by a defense contractor, LMI Government Consulting, suggests that the Pentagon might consume as much as 340,000 barrels (14 million gallons) every day. This is greater than the total national consumption of Sweden or Switzerland.

[Michael Klare: June 14, 2007: Mother Jones]



Vinod Khosla writes:

I do not focus on peak oil as much but that does not mean I don’t recognize it as a potential problem. I do think we will probably (nothing is certain) run out of air to put the oil emissions into before we run out of oil.

[Vinod Khosla: The Oil Drum]

Via Boing Boing.

Vinod Khosla @ Wikipedia



Ecuador seeking return to OPEC

The Ecuadorian government announced Thursday that it is seeking to rejoin the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC).

OPEC logo… Ecuador joined OPEC in 1972 but left 20 years later, mainly due to not agreeing with the oil cartel’s quota requirement.

… The oil income remains a critical part of the country’s economy, accounting for 69 percent of its exports. From January to November daily oil output stood at 539,000 barrels, and crude exports exceeded 6.4 billion dollars.

[People’s Daily (Xinhua)]

Ecuador open to private oil investment

Quito: Ecuador’s week-old leftist government has said it was open to private energy investment despite plans to review oil contracts amid a wave of resource nationalism in allied Venezuela and Bolivia.

President Rafael Correa, a friend of Venezuela’s socialist leader Hugo Chavez, has pledged to fight poverty in a radical four-year term by rewriting energy deals, foreign debt accords and the constitution of the unstable, oil-exporting nation.

Ecuador’s finance minister said authorities have discussed possible loans from Venezuela for up to $1 billion, which could further cement Ecuador’s ties to Latin America’s harshest critic of Washington-backed, free-market reforms.

But in remarks that may ease some investor fears, Energy Minister Alberto Acosta said the Correa administration would not apply nationalisation policies to Ecuador’s oil fields and he welcomed private investment in electricity generation.

… He ruled out auctioning oilfields formerly run by US-based Occidental Petroleum Corp, which is requesting $1 billion in damages after Ecuador seized its operations over a contract dispute last year.

But Ecuador plans to hold bidding rounds for oilfields and offshore natural gas blocks, he said.

Still, he also said the Andean country was seeking to join the Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (Opec) and mulling electricity subsidies for Ecuador’s poor majority, reflecting the populist ideas that helped catapult Correa into office.

… Finance Minister Ricardo Patino said … $1 billion in loans from Venezuela would improve Ecuador’s cash flow situation. That could give the government more resources to pay debt - but also draw Correa closer to the increasingly radical Chavez.

… Ceremonies for his inauguration were dominated by [Evo] Morales, who last year nationalised gas fields, and Chavez, who has extended his nationalisation drive this year with moves against private oil and electricity companies.

[Gulf News (Reuters)]

Occidental Files Claim Against Government of Ecuador

On May 18, 2006, Occidental Petroleum Corporation today filed an arbitration claim against the Government of Ecuador, seeking redress for Ecuador’s illegal confiscation of Occidental’s Block 15 operations in Ecuador. The company filed its claim with the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes in Washington DC, invoking the protections of the US-Ecuador Bilateral Investment Treaty. Occidental has requested the arbitration panel order interim relief by restoring its rights in Ecuador and preventing Ecuador from replacing Occidental with another third party operator in Block 15 until its claims can be decided, a process that could take well over a year.

[Occidental Petroleum Corporation]

Ecuador cancels oil contract with Occidental Petroleum - May 2005

Ecuador, which has Latin America’s fifth largest oil reserves, cancelled Occidental Petroleum Company’s operating contract in the country and ordered the US firm’s assets seized.

Energy Minister Ivan Rodriguez made the announcement after Occidental was found guilty of illegal sale of its stock and after rejecting its attempt to avoid the sanction.

‘We have decided to accept the suit and petition brought by Petroecuador and the prosecutor’s office, and the joint venture contract has been declared void,’ Rodriguez said in a news conference.

… Rodriguez said the firm would have to ‘immediately’ hand back its oil fields and production machinery to the state firm, Petroecuador.

… There were widespread protests by indigenous groups in February demanding a greater share of the country’s oil profits.

[Forbes.com]

Ecuadorian President Approves Pipeline Backed by Occidental - June 2001

The president of Ecuador, Gustavo Noboa, recently gave the go-ahead for the construction of a US$1.1 billion oil pipeline in the northern part of the country that is highly likely to have severe environmental and social impacts for local communities. With his approval Noboa declared “war” on environmental groups in Ecuador, in particular Accion Ecologica who is adamantly opposed to the pipeline. “I’m not going to let anyone screw with the country, I’ll give them war!” said Noboa.

The pipeline, known as the OCP (Oleoducto de Crudo Presado) is controlled by an international consortium of companies including Alberta Energy, Occidental Petroleum, Repsol-YPF, Agip, Perez-Companc and Kerr-McGee. Occidental Petroleum in particular has a heinous environmental and human rights track record in nearby Colombia and was key in lobbying the US government to finance Plan Colombia.

… Ecuador’s past experience with pipelines gives little confidence that the OCP will be trouble-free. Less than a month ago, the state owned pipeline ruptured due to a landslide, spilling 7,000 barrels of oil into the forest. This accident is the 14th major oil spill from this pipeline since 1998. In the past 3 years, a total of 145,000 barrels of oil have been spilled into the ecosystem, causing devastating impacts including soil and groundwater contamination. As the OCP is also in a landslide and earthquake prone area, accidents are inevitable.

Less concerned with environmental and local economic impacts, President Noboa has approved the project which is he expects will increase oil export and therefore annual GDP by 2.5% for the next 20 years.

* “Ecuadorian President Declares “War” On Environmentalists Over Criticism Of Pipeline; Nobody is going to screw us,” May 18, 2001;

* “Ecuador boosts exploration efforts,” The Oil and Gas Journal, April 12, 2001;

* “Oil and cloud-forests don’t mix,” The Economist, June 21, 2001

[moles.org]



Not breaking news, but interesting:

Money for Nothing: Billions of dollars have disappeared, gone to bribe Iraqis and line contractors’ pockets.
by Philip Giraldi - The American Conservative - October 24, 2005

When the final page is written on America’s catastrophic imperial venture, one word will dominate the explanation of U.S. failure—corruption. Large-scale and pervasive corruption meant that available resources could not be used to stabilize and secure Iraq in the early days of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), when it was still possible to do so. Continuing corruption meant that the reconstruction of infrastructure never got underway, giving the Iraqi people little incentive to co-operate with the occupation. Ongoing corruption in arms procurement and defense spending means that Baghdad will never control a viable army while the Shi’ite and Kurdish militias will grow stronger and produce a divided Iraq in which constitutional guarantees will be irrelevant.

Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA)The American-dominated Coalition Provisional Authority could well prove to be the most corrupt administration in history, almost certainly surpassing the widespread fraud of the much-maligned UN Oil for Food Program. At least $20 billion that belonged to the Iraqi people has been wasted, together with hundreds of millions of U.S. taxpayer dollars. Exactly how many billions of additional dollars were squandered, stolen, given away, or simply lost will never be known because the deliberate decision by the CPA not to meter oil exports means that no one will ever know how much revenue was generated during 2003 and 2004.

… The 15-month proconsulship of the CPA disbursed nearly $20 billion, two-thirds of it in cash, most of which came from the Development Fund for Iraq that had replaced the UN Oil for Food Program and from frozen and seized Iraqi assets. Most of the money was flown into Iraq on C-130s in huge plastic shrink-wrapped pallets holding 40 “cashpaks,” each cashpak having $1.6 million in $100 bills. Twelve billion dollars moved that way between May 2003 and June 2004, drawn from accounts administered by the New York Federal Reserve Bank. The $100 bills weighed an estimated 363 tons.

Once in Iraq, there was virtually no accountability over how the money was spent. There was also considerable money “off the books,” including as much as $4 billion from illegal oil exports. The CPA and the Iraqi State Oil Marketing Board, which it controlled, made a deliberate decision not to record or “meter” oil exports, an invitation to wholesale fraud and black marketeering.

… The only certified public-accounting firm used by the CPA to monitor its spending was a company called North Star Consultants, located in San Diego, which was so small that it operated out of a private home. It was subsequently determined that North Star did not, in fact, perform any review of the CPA’s internal spending controls. Today, no one can account for billions of those dollars or even suggest how the money was spent. And as the CPA no longer exists, there is also little interest in re-examining its transparency or accountability.

[Link]

The article further notes: “Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney’s former company, has a no-bid monopoly contract with the Army Corps of Engineers that is now estimated to be worth $10 billion.”

Kellogg, Brown and Root (KBR), a Halliburton subsidiary, has it fingers in a wide variety of pies:

Detention Camps: The Next Generation

Failing to Rebuild Iraq

Wikipedia: Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA)

The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) was established as a transitional government following the invasion of Iraq by the United States, United Kingdom and the other members of the multinational coalition which was formed to oust the government of Saddam Hussein in 2003. Citing UN Security Council Resolution 1483 (2003), and the laws of war, the CPA vested itself with executive, legislative, and judicial authority over the Iraqi government from the period of the CPA’s inception on April 21, 2003, until its dissolution on June 28, 2004.

[Wikipedia: Link]

SourceWatchSourceWatch casts a critical eye upon CPA:

Following the establishment of limited Iraqi sovereignty: June 30, 2004, the CPA is scheduled to cease existence. In its stead will be the US Mission to Iraq.

None the less, “A comprehensive examination of the U.S.-led agency that oversaw the rebuilding of Iraq has triggered at least 27 criminal investigations and produced evidence of millions of dollars’ worth of fraud, waste and abuse, according to a report by the Coalition Provisional Authority’s inspector general,” Stuart W. Bowen Jr. : Link

[C]ontractors accused of fraud in the fulfillment of CPA contacts have been claiming that the United States Federal Court system does not have juristiction in deciding these cases. (see David Phinney, “Iraq Contractor Claims Immunity From Fraud Laws: Seized Oil Assets Paid For Offshore Overbilling”, CorpWatch, December 23rd, 2004: Link

A study publishd by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), authored by L. Elaine Halchin, Analyst in American National Government Government and Finance Division: “The Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA): Origin, Characteristics, and Institutional Authorities”, April 29, 2004 - [FAS Hosted PDF file: Link) discovered that there was a great deal of murkiness surrounding the conception of the CPA, and that documents offered by the Bush Administration have served to increase the cloudiness …

[SourceWatch: Link]



Global Public Media interviews physicist Albert Bartlett during the ASPO USA conference in Denver, Colorado:

“Sustainable growth is an oxymoron, because if you just look at the arithmetic of steady growth, the numbers become astronomically large in modest periods of time, so you can’t have steady growth.”
[Link]

Via Jim H.

Association for the Study of Peak Oil & GAS – USA (ASPO-USA) :
“A Non-profit, Non-partisan Research and Public Education Initiative to Address America’s Peak Oil Energy Challenge”



The New York Times: “Rebuilding of Iraqi Pipeline as Disaster Waiting to Happen”

A crew had bulldozed a 300-foot-long trench along a giant drill bit in their desperate attempt to yank it loose from the riverbed. A supervisor later told him that the project’s crews knew that drilling the holes was not possible, but that they had been instructed by the company in charge of the project to continue anyway.

A few weeks later, after the project had burned up all of the $75.7 million allocated to it, the work came to a halt.

The project, called the Fatah pipeline crossing, had been a critical element of a $2.4 billion no-bid reconstruction contract that a Halliburton subsidiary had won from the Army …
[Link]



boy the way consumers paid,
wars that made the hit parade,
guys like us we had it made,
those were the days,
and you know where you were then,
girls were girls and men were men,
mister we could use a man like Richard Nixon again,
didn’t need no welfare state
everybody pulled his weight,
gee our oil wells ran great,
those were the days!

(With apologies to All in the Family.)



Greg Palast on US goals in Iraq:

Iraqi oil well burning, Rumeila area[W]hat did the USA want Iraq to do with Iraq’s oil? The answer will surprise many of you: and it is uglier, more twisted, devilish and devious than anything imagined by the most conspiracy-addicted blogger. The answer can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq’s oil secretly drafted by the State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn’t matter. The key thing is what’s inside this thick Bush diktat: a directive to Iraqis to maintain a state oil company that will “enhance its relationship with OPEC.”

OPEC logoEnhance its relationship with OPEC??? How strange: the government of the United States ordering Iraq to support the very OPEC oil cartel which is strangling our nation with outrageously high prices for crude.

Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep a lid on Iraq’s oil production — limiting Iraq’s oil pumping to the tight quota set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.

There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil — not to get MORE of Iraq’s oil, but to prevent Iraq producing TOO MUCH of it.

You must keep in mind who paid for George’s ranch and Dick’s bunker: Big Oil. And Big Oil — and their buck-buddies, the Saudis — don’t make money from pumping more oil, but from pumping LESS of it. The lower the supply, the higher the price.

It’s Economics 101. The oil industry is run by a cartel, OPEC, and what economists call an “oligopoly” — a tiny handful of operators who make more money when there’s less oil, not more of it. So, every time the “insurgents” blow up a pipeline in Basra, every time Mad Mahmoud in Tehran threatens to cut supply, the price of oil leaps.

Link.