Tue 26 Aug 2008
Who started the South Ossetia War?
Tuesday, Aug 26th, 2008 at 7:38 amCategories: War; Russia; Georgia
Posted by Administrator
No Comments

It’s very difficult — perhaps impossible — to know the truth about war. For what it’s worth:
Virtually everyone believes Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili foolishly provoked a Russian invasion on August 7, 2008, when he sent troops into the breakaway district of South Ossetia. “The warfare began Aug. 7 when Georgia launched a barrage targeting South Ossetia,” the Associated Press reported over the weekend in typical fashion.
Virtually everyone is wrong. Georgia didn’t start it on August 7, nor on any other date. The South Ossetian militia started it on August 6 when its fighters fired on Georgian peacekeepers and Georgian villages with weapons banned by the agreement hammered out between the two sides in 1994. At the same time, the Russian military sent its invasion force bearing down on Georgia from the north side of the Caucasus Mountains on the Russian side of the border through the Roki tunnel and into Georgia. This happened before Saakashvili sent additional troops to South Ossetia and allegedly started the war.
- Michael J. Totten: Link.
Via Wired.com: Link.
See Also
Gorbachev on war and peace in the Caucasus
You can sell a lot of different weapon systems to foreign militaries, but where exactly do we get off in selling the Iraqi army our top military weapon systems? Do they rank with the Saudis now? We just got done beating these guys a few years ago. Do we want to come back some day and stare down the 120mm tubes of our own “used tanks”? And as we’re growing our Army’s end-strength, is there such a situation where we sell “used tanks” instead of refurbing them and using them ourselves?


“In one shoot-out, the KGB found themselves up against men from the interior ministry, as the security services were effectively privatised, each arm guarding a different client.”
“Backing paper money with mortgages is nothing new. The French tried it in the late 18th Century, and it lead to hyperinflation.”
In a surprise move, the Federal Reserve announced its intention to swap $200 billion of
which means they are liabilities of the Fed. When it puts newly minted notes into circulation it does so by buying assets, usually U.S. treasuries, which it then holds on its balance sheet to offset that liability. By swapping treasuries for mortgages, the Fed effectively alters the compilation of its 


… We are now heading into a period of enormous cultural transformation, and Obama is the kind of soul that can instinctively feel and understand, indeed, articulate a new planetary civilization. Obama is not a messianic figure that we need fear as some crazed cult leader; he more simply, and more enduringly, embodies a paradigm shift in American political leadership. Hillary may scoff at him and claim that his years in an Indonesian Muslim elementary school do not count as foreign policy experience, because she is thinking as the technocratic policy wonk that she is. It is precisely Obama’s experiences in Hawaii, Indonesia, and Kenya that are soul-forming for a future global leader. Hillary and McCain are the old paradigm of politics: the Eastern technocratic manager and the sunbelt suburban Goldwater-Reagan reactionary calling for tax cuts and militarism to solve all problems with a hatchet or a bomb.